Writing an action research proposal is your first step in getting approval to undertake your research and it needs to be done in a through and very convincing manner. Your tutor and the supervisory committee are going to want to see that you have a sound grasp of the problem, the current literature and of course the precise methods that you are hoping to use to solve the problem. If you cannot convince them that you have all of this and that your project has a good chance of success then you will be unlikely to be allowed to continue to the actual research. A great deal of time needs to be invested in your proposal as well as enormous amount of thought and research; a specialized writing service such as ours can help you with this
One of these teachers quickly prepared a research proposal that was approved by her supervisory committee and her school and district administration. The research was then sent to the REB for approval. The application followed the pattern we had learned to adopt for action research proposals. That is, to indicate that the classroom practice was to be implemented as part of the regular classroom program and to ask for permission from the parents and the students to use unidentified samples of their work in the project report as well as consent to report reading scores from the beginning and end of the term using only pseudonyms. The REB reviewed the proposal and a reply was received in about four weeks with the inevitable minor changes to the information and consent letters to be sent home. There was also a caveat that because the proposal included the comparison of results from another study, the REB required the approval of the other teacher's proposal as well in order to proceed with the project. 
EDD 581 Action Research Proposal
To achieve this objective, the critical action research proposals (Grundy, 1982; Carr and Kemmis, 1988), based on Habermas, condition their performance to a systematic reflection on the practice and on the theoretical analysis of how the institutional and social contexts limit the subjects� performance. The goal is having this understanding process transform the non-reflexive practice into i.e., into socially committed and theoretically founded action, which may transform the theory that informed it (Contreras, 1994).